Modernise the Fleet

The increased fatality figures in New South Wales have led to calls to modernise the fleet. The shock of the steep increase in deaths in 2017 has provoked a reaction and a number of different solutions have been put forward, including fleet modernisation.

First of all it was Michael Byrne, Toll CEO, in his open letter to the Prime Minister which called for a number of changes. This has been followed by a call from the Truck Industry Council also citing the high average age of the Australian fleet and the corresponding lack of modern safety equipment. Read more

A Result, of Sorts

The recent attention given to the trucking industry has led to a result, of sorts, for those trying to bring important issues affecting trucking to the fore. The bad news about increased accidents involving trucks, specifically in New South Wales led to a lot of media reaction and some useful initiatives by stakeholders.

One of the good signs was a more measured approach by some of the media. In the past, any kind of bad news like this would be reported with a litany of horrific truck accidents and little commentary from anyone apart from the Transport Workers Union, who would invariably fan the flames. Read more

Ramping Up the Safety Agenda

Recent events have seen a number of people ramping up the safety agenda, but it shouldn’t need severe criticism from elsewhere to get us fired up. The trucking industry needs to stand together as a single unit on these kinds of issues and present a strong and practical front, backed up by good PR, there is no room for error.

It all started with the road crash statistics from last year. Although relatively low in number, the percentage jump in deaths from accidents involving trucks in NSW was something the anti-trucking  lobby could hang their arguments on. Read more

Remain Vigilant

Heading Them Off At The Pass

The latest crash figures are raising issues and the trucking industry should be heading them off at the pass. The numbers look bad in some areas and are providing fuel to those who want to take the big stick to trucking.


We have been down this road many times before and it’s about time we learnt our lesson. There has been a blip in accident figures which are largely unexplained. We have seen the number of deaths resulting from accidents involving trucks on our roads gradually get lower year-on-year since the eighties, until now.


The reasons for this are many. but the increased awareness of the importance of safety within the trucking industry were one of the major contributors to the drop in fatalities. This result is something which shines a positive light on the trucking industry.


The mayhem on the roads of NSW in late 1989 were a catalyst for the changes. The deaths of a large number of people in two accidents involving buses on the Pacific Highway provoked a government backlash, which could have had a drastic effect on the way the trucking industry operated.


That backlash was largely averted by a massive campaign to get road safety front and centre in the minds of those working with trucks. Smart initiatives demonstrated a genuine commitment from a major part of the road transport industry to run a safe operation. The initiatives included the Transport Workers Union and the industry projected a united front to the authorities to assure them of the reality of the changes.


Last year’s accident figures show increased accidents involving trucks in New South Wales. This is enough for campaigners against the trucking industry to be able to start to talking up measures like the infamous remuneration tribunal. There’s been an opinion piece in the Sydney Morning Herald blaming productivity-based pay for the accident increase.


Opposition Transport Spokesperson, Anthony Albanese was interviewed on the ABC about rising car accident figures in Australia. He did not miss out on the opportunity to mention truck accident numbers and call for something like the RSRT to return to the statute books.


This should be a call to action for the trucking industry. If we don’t want something like the RSRT to rear it’s ugly head, then we need to come up with a viable alternative. There are some initiatives going on at the moment which should be effective in reducing truck related deaths, but they do not have the quick fix logic, or image, the RSRT possessed.


This is where we have to be smart about the topic. The trucking industry needs to present a genuine and easily explained potential solution to these headline accident figures. It has to be something the media would report and it has to have credibility.


This has been a perennial problem for the industry. There have been safety initiatives and real improvements in outcomes across the board, but it has not been communicated professionally and the cowboy operators who grab the headlines and drag the industry down are, firstly tolerated, and then do something to tarnish the image of the whole industry.

Remain Vigilant

Clogging Up the New Year

Continued congestion issues mean we will be clogging up the New Year even more than the last one. Productivity will be compromised by unreliable delivery times and the customer will not be willing to pay a congestion levy.


Congestion in Australian cities is increasing every year and, according to the latest Cost of Congestion report from Tom Tom Telematics, $3.5 billion worth of time is lost each year because of traffic issues.


Traffic in our ten busiest cities is increasing travel times by 28 per cent. Sydney is congestion top dog and Perth is the only city which didn’t see an increase in congestion last year. Melbourne and the Gold Coast are growing fast with a four per cent increase in congestion in the last year.


As with many of the statistics put out by major companies and agencies, the road transport industry is ignored. There are figures in the report for light commercial vehicles and light rigid trucks and the 160,000 plus vehicles included are losing well over 19 million hours each year to congestion.


If this is the case for these smaller flexible vehicles with minimal access restrictions, the effect on heavier trucks must be more profound, with less opportunity to divert through city back streets.


The cost to trucking is extremely difficult to quantify. It’s no good counting the number of loads which arrive late. Smart operators wanting to keep a contract will pull loading times forward to ensure the goods do reach their destination in time. The customer carries on receiving its goods at the right time and sees little effect from congestion.


However, the fact of the matter is it is taking longer and longer each year to get truck Z from point A to point B and there seems to be little we can do about it. The big customer/small operator power imbalance means the trucking operation will have to suck it up, when looking at congestion.


There is no cure for congestion, but there are ways of improving outcomes. Unfortunately, improving congestion comes down to improving infrastructure, or improving the way we use the infrastructure.


Infrastructure is a very expensive business, costing billions on top of billions. This makes it politically sensitive, governments have to sell infrastructure spending to the electorate. There are more votes in the car driving community than there are in the truck community, and the votes driving cars are more likely to live in the local constituency.


Any infrastructure is likely to prioritise improvement for car traffic, which should have a knock-on effect of improving congestion out comes for truckies to some extent.


So, there’s a conundrum to ponder while you are sitting in a traffic queue on in one of our cities over the next few weeks, trying to get down to the beach, or into a DC, who is willing to pay for all of us clogging up the New Year?

Remain Vigilant

Why Are Major Companies Disconnecting Safety Systems?

The question has to be asked, why are major companies disconnecting safety systems on their trucks? Combinations are running around with ABS or EBS fitted on trailers but disconnected from the prime mover. This is essentially disabling a sophisticated electronic system from doing its job, which is improving safety and saving lives.


The major question that is exercising my mind is what is the basic philosophy and thinking behind someone making a decision to deliberately disable a safety system? We can only guess at the actual motives of those involved. We can be sure that if the proverbial did hit the fan, and one of these vehicles was involved in a major incident, the reactions by the media and the public to the knowledge, that the EBS was turned off, would lead to great deal of truckie bashing.


There are two issues at play here. One is a wording in the rules that has led some people to read it to mean their truck will be compliant even with the ABS/EBS disconnected. This is not something we need to discuss here. The chances are, the rules’ wording will be tightened up in 2018.


The second issue is more of a big-picture problem. Just because there is a loophole in the law, doesn’t mean you have to use it. However, there is good evidence to suggest a large number of trucks are running around our highways, fully loaded, with the ABS or EBS unplugged.


We are not talking about livestock trucks running on dirt roads. They do have cause to disconnect ABS on dirt as the system will compromise stopping distances on loose ground. We are talking about trucks and trailers running on the major highways at full mass.


The problem seems to be some people, including a lot of drivers, don’t ‘believe’ in ABS or EBS. They seem to think it is like global warming, something invented by scientists to shut down coal powered power stations. There is a belief EBS and ABS don’t brake a combination as well as a skilled driver.


When ABS/EBS is mandated on trucks and trailers, some drivers complain bitterly about how the system keeps on cutting in and slowing the truck. There is also a belief the only way to pull up multiple trailers in a straight line is by skillful manipulation of the hand-piece.


Yes, the first time you use ABS/EBS it can be a little disconcerting. Hitting the brakes hard in a traditionally braked combination sees an immediate feeling of braking, even if some of the trailers start to drift out and shove the prime mover around. Hitting the brakes in a fully EBS combination can feel like the braking is softer, even less effective.


The fact of the matter is the combination is able to brake more safely if it is fitted with state-of-the-art braking systems. With traditionally braked systems it is a bit of a lottery.


Yes, the EBS will cut in sometimes, but this is only when the trailers are getting close to a rollover situation. All drivers need to realise a lot of their driving habits of the past do take them too close to the rollover threshold than is desirable.


These are cold hard facts. It is not a matter of whether you ‘believe’ in EBS or ABS, it’s a matter of using the safest possible system to keep everyone on the roads safe. It’s a matter of understanding scientific fact and acting accordingly.


We went though the same process with disc brakes. They were effective at stopping a truck quicker, but rejected on grounds that were more about ‘belief’ than cold hard fact. Now, the proportion of disc-braked trailers in the fleet is rising rapidly and we are all safer, as a result.

Remain Vigilant

It’s Access, Stupid!

It’s not the economy, it’s access, stupid! That’s the problem dogging the trucking industry in its attempt to keep up with the need for improved productivity and capacity. The original phrase, which Diesel News is paraphrasing here, was ‘It’s the Economy, Stupid!’. The slogan was plastered over the desks of those working in the Bill Clinton Presidential Election campaign, back in 1992.


The phrase was an answer to the question everyone was asking at the time. What is the most important issue to the US voter in this election. It was the economy then and probably is the economy now, in the minds of US voters. However, ‘how do we get rid of this Trump guy?’ might also be on the minds of many stateside.


There is no doubt about the answer to the question, which needs to be asked, about what is the main issue holding the trucking industry in Australia back. It’s Access, Stupid! Operators big and small, handling goods over short distances or interstate, in every industry segment, are hamstrung by the inability to be able to get a particularly efficient truck on a certain section of road, which is capable of handling that truck.


Road managers across Australia are knocking back applications, or making it clear there is no point in applying to use a route with a particular truck, all across the country. The reasons for these decisions being made are many and varied and often unfathomable from the point of view of the trucking operator trying move freight for their customer in a cost-effective way.


There is an element of lack of knowledge on the part of local authorities, especially in rural areas, about what the effect of truck A on route B would have on the road’s integrity. As a result, the knee-jerk answer is to say no, stick with what we are doing now – it seems to work.


Of course, there are some commendable exceptions in some areas where the trucking industry is a particularly important part of the local economy. They are open to ideas and will make the effort to get improved productivity vehicles over the line.


Unfortunately, the converse is also true. The other local authorities through which said truck may need to pass, may not be seeing any real benefit to their local economy and are not incentivised to go out on a limb and allow an innovative truck on the road.


In the big cities, the situation is beginning to get fraught. There is a direct relationship between a city community undergoing economic growth and the need to bring more freight into the community. Instead, we see trucks labelled as ‘monsters’ and ‘dirty’, they are portrayed by some campaigners as a threat to children’s health.


Truck bans and curfews make life difficult for any one trying to get goods into or through these areas. As a rule, politicians are averse to being seen to be connected in any way to this truck traffic and find it hard to make ‘brave’ decisions to improve truck access in the city.


Add to this the road and bridge engineers who make calculations assuming all trucks are going on their bit of road grossly over weight and liable to break everything. They are demanding Intelligent Access Program monitoring, which ensures correct axle loading, but ignore the fact the trucks are not going to be overloaded.


As a result of all of these problems we do not have B-triples plying their trade between all of our major cities. There is minimal access for A-doubles on routes like the Hume, Western and Newell Highways, even though the road infrastructure can handle them.


At the same time, extra trucks are driving around in the big cities because the authorities will not allow quad axle trailers with a steering axle on many streets and neither will they allow over dimension trailers easily capable of general access.

Remain Vigilant

The Lack of Bright Young People

There has been plenty of wringing of hands about the lack of bright young people coming into trucking, but not much has been done. Hats off to NatRoad, who has bitten the bullet and is getting behind a strong initiative designed to kick-start the development of a culture of inclusion for young people in the trucking industry.


The announcement by NatRoad talks about ‘driving’ young people into the Australian trucking industry. Let’s hope we don’t have to drive them, but more entice and attract them into a vibrant, growing industry, one which leads the world in terms of productivity and technical development and one in which they feel they can prosper.


The program in question is the Commonwealth Government’s Youth Jobs PaTH (Prepare Trial-Hire) scheme. The scheme has had success in hospitality and construction and is backed by $760 million in funding from the 2016–17 Federal Budget.


One important factor will be the low risk attached to the scheme on the part of employers. People between the ages of 17 and 24 can train as an intern in a trucking business for up to 12 weeks. If, at the end of that time, the employer likes the look of the youngster and has seen them pick up and develop skills during the internship, they can take them on and receive an incentive of between $6,500 and $12,000. The commitment is to employing them, full, part time or casual for the following six months.


This is a genuine opportunity for the whole trucking industry to do something about an issue we have been complaining about but doing very little to solve. Now is the time to break out the self-imposed ghetto we have kept the industry in and break out to become the kind of vibrant and attractive industry we know it can be.


Simply by bringing in youngsters as interns and speaking to them, learning what they are looking for in a career, we can improve the industry. The process of becoming an attractive career is as much about listening and learning for the employers as it is about the young people learning from them.


It is possible, especially in a trucking industry that can take up your entire life 24/7 for years on end, to develop a bunker mentality. In that bunker the information coming in from outside is limited and it is difficult to keep up with changing times and changing social attitudes among young people.


Yes, the generation coming into the workforce does have a different attitude to work and what they expect from it, than many in the industry have. The fact of the matter is, they do have a different perspective and we need them, desperately. It is up to us – the grumpy older generation that likes to romanticise the good old days, when there were no rules and plenty of hard yakka – to snap out of it.


This is the 21st century and, with an average truck driver age of 53, the current working environment is becoming less and less sustainable every year. There is no time to lose – trucking needs to get its act together and increase the flow of youngsters to freshen the whole game up.


There is little or no choice – demographics are against you. It is important to grab an opportunity like this new initiative being led by NatRoad and bring in some youngsters, get to know them and their like and dislikes.


It’s Access, Stupid!

Manufacturing in Australia Is Dead!

We are constantly being told manufacturing in Australia is dead! In fact, we in the trucking industry know manufacturing in Australia is far from dead, as far as trucks, trailers and trucking is concerned.


Yes, Holden, Ford, Toyota and Mitsubishi have bitten the dust – and the kind of large scale mass manufacturing needed to make cars has probably gone, never to return. There are, however, some big companies in Australia making big bucks from vehicle manufacture, they just aren’t high-profile businesses constantly in the public eye.


Last week, Diesel News made its way to the Volvo Group’s Wacol truck assembly plant to see trucks number 60,000 and 60,001 roll off the end of the production line, one Volvo FH and a Mack Superliner.


They were wrapped in green and gold artwork displaying the Australia Made logo – they are able to show this label as the manufacturing process is deemed by the Australia Made organisation to meet its criteria.


‘What criteria?’ I hear you ask. Well, the criteria for manufactured products were changed in February this year from a narrow definition of a 50-per-cent-of-the-cost-of-production test to a new definition which talks about a ‘substantial transformation’.


The definition now goes like this:


“A fundamental change – in form, appearance or nature, such that the goods existing after the change are new and different goods from those existing before the change.

What does that mean?

It means that simple treatments or processing – such as repackaging or mere assembly – are not likely to qualify an otherwise imported good for the ‘Made in Australia’ claim.

An item must be ‘substantially transformed’ in Australia.”


The Volvo and Mack product fit the new description, as do the other two truck manufacturers putting together trucks in Australia, Kenworth and Iveco. All three take a slightly different approach to the way a truck is made, but all fit into the made in Australia ideal.


Of course, the engines are not made here in Australia. Nobody makes engines here anymore. The capital cost is too high. Volvo, Mack and, in some cases, Kenworth do not construct the cabins in Australia either, but just about everything else is sourced here. Iveco actually presses the raw steel to make the cabins for the Acco trucks that collect our garbage and deliver our concrete.


When we look at the trailers being hauled by these trucks, they are all, with a few exceptions, made here in Australia from scratch. The trailer manufacturing industry is a true Aussie one. It goes all the way from high-volume assembly-line trailer making, to one man and his dog, with a welder, putting together custom-built specialised trailing equipment for the trucking industry.


The trailer industry makes gear to suit Australian conditions, to cope with our terrible roads and our – higher-than-anywhere-else – masses. The stresses and strains we put our trailing gear through are unimaginable for many of the trailer designers plying their trade in Europe and the US.


This is just the headline equipment that is manufactured here. There are all those component manufacturers also doing their bit to keep Australian manufacturing alive. I recently had the opportunity to tour the new Dana plant in Keysborough in Victoria. The company took a hit when Ford closed its plant, but the new facility is now buzzing with activity, building axles and driveshafts for all three truck makers who build here in Australia


Manufacturing in Australia is dead? Long live manufacturing in Australia!

Who Does What?

People outside or new to the trucking industry often ask why there are so many industry associations and who does what. The answer can often be quite complex and the history of trucking’s relationship with governments, both state and federal, needs to illustrate where they all came from. Read more